Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India
Open Access
Online Resource
Type Journal Article
Year 2022
Language English
Views 28
Downloads 0
Finance & Accounting

Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India

Pankaj Chaudhary
External / Open Access
2022 AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130

Abstract

Purpose - The author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019. Design/methodology/approach - The author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal with endogeneity concerns prevalent in corporate finance variables. Findings - The agency view is consistent with the board size in the context of India. The author observed that the board size has a harmful effect on agency cost. A larger board size may create a coordination problem, or CEO may find it easy to thrust his or her decisions on board. The author also noticed that firms should have sizeable institutional ownership, particularly pressure-insensitive investors, in equity as they can reduce agency-related issues. Originality/value - This study focuses on one of the largest emerging economies, i.e. India.
Full Title Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India
Primary Author Pankaj Chaudhary
Publication Type Journal Article
Year 2022
Journal AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research)
Volume / Issue Vol. 7, No. 1
Pages 44–58
Category Finance & Accounting
Institution External / Open Access
Access Open Access
Added to Library March 24, 2026

Cite This Publication

APA
Pankaj Chaudhary (2022). Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India. *AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research)*, 7(1), 44–58.
MLA
Pankaj Chaudhary. "Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India." *AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research)*, vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, pp. 44–58.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130