Strategic Management & Leadership
Needs Assessment of Entrepreneurship knowledge and Skill Education a Comparative Approach in Different Fields of Humanities
External / Open Access
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the status of entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial training needs assessment of Humanities. Two types of questionnaires were designed and distributed among 97 students and 36 professors in order to collect the information. Results showed that almost all students and professors of Humanities believe that entrepreneurship educations leave much to be desired. In fact, materials, content and teaching methods are not appropriate to convey the concepts of entrepreneurship and business to students. Professors of Humanities also believe that incorporating concepts such as fundamentals of business, business planning, communications, organization and management, legal and commercial regulations, accounting, financial management, e-business, launching a business, marketing, strategic management, international business, and entrepreneurial skills as an academic training courses in the syllabus is key to improve the students' entrepreneurial knowledge and skills.
Full Title
Needs Assessment of Entrepreneurship knowledge and Skill Education a Comparative Approach in Different Fields of Humanities
Primary Author
S. Safari
Co-Authors
M. Samiazadeh
Publication Type
Journal Article
Year
2012
Journal
Fanāvarī-i āmūzish
Volume / Issue
Vol. 6, No. 4
Pages
287–301
Category
Strategic Management & Leadership
Institution
External / Open Access
Access
Open Access
Added to Library
March 24, 2026
Cite This Publication
APA
S. Safari, M. Samiazadeh (2012). Needs Assessment of Entrepreneurship knowledge and Skill Education a Comparative Approach in Different Fields of Humanities. *Fanāvarī-i āmūzish*, 6(4), 287–301.
MLA
S. Safari. "Needs Assessment of Entrepreneurship knowledge and Skill Education a Comparative Approach in Different Fields of Humanities." *Fanāvarī-i āmūzish*, vol. 6, no. 4, 2012, pp. 287–301.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2012.198